Cited by 239Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Top Carnivores in the Suburbs? Ecological and Conservation Issues Raised by Colonization of North eastern North America by Coyotes

GOMPPER, MATTHEW E.·2002·BioScience

Abstract

Just a handful of individual members of a population of top predators—wolves and tigers, orcas, and great white sharks, for example—hold the potential to disproportionately influence animal and plant communities. The importance of this phenomenon, known as a “top-down” effect, has been demonstrated in several recent studies. For example, as few as four killer whales may be responsible for a shift in 800 kilometers of Alaskan near-shore community structure, from a structure dominated by kelp forests with few herbivores to one with high numbers of sea urchins and low kelp densities (Estes et al. 1998). Similarly, just two or three wolf packs indirectly control tree community organization by regulating moose numbers in 544-km2 Isle Royale, Michigan (Post et al. 1999). In coastal southern California, the presence or absence of coyotes in patches of sage–scrub habitat directly controls the distribution and abundance of smaller carnivores, which in turn alter scrub-breeding bird communities (Crooks and Soulé 1999).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0185:tcitse]2.0.co;2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Balcom, 1996, Conservation Biology, 10, 515, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020515.x · DOI
  2. Bartmann, 1992, Wildlife Monographs, 121, 1
  3. Crête, 1995, Canadian Field-Naturalist, 109, 227, 10.5962/p.357617 · DOI
  4. Crooks, 1999, Nature, 400, 563, 10.1038/23028 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dumont, 2000, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 764, 10.1139/z99-264 · DOI
  6. Estes, 1998, Science, 282, 473, 10.1126/science.282.5388.473 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Harrison, 1989, Journal of Wildlife Management, 53, 181, 10.2307/3801327 · DOI
  8. Henke, 1999, Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 1066, 10.2307/3802826 · DOI
  9. Knowlton, 1999, Journal of Range Management, 52, 398, 10.2307/4003765 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Litvaitis, 1989, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67, 1180, 10.1139/z89-170 · DOI
  11. Ray, 2000, Wildlife Conservation Society Working Paper, 15, 1
  12. Rogers, 1998, Oecologia, 116, 227, 10.1007/s004420050583 · DOI
  13. Sovada, 1995, Journal of Wildlife Management, 59, 1, 10.2307/3809108 · DOI
  14. Thurber, 1991, Journal of Mammalogy, 72, 750, 10.2307/1381838 · DOI
  15. 2000, Federal Register, 65, 16052
  16. 2000, Federal Register, 65, 43450
  17. Van Buskirk, 1995, Ecological Applications, 5, 1133, 10.2307/2269360 · DOI
  18. Whitlaw, 1998, Journal of Wildlife Management, 62, 1335, 10.2307/3801999 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
GOMPPER, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
GOMPPER, MATTHEW E.
Venue
BioScience
Published
2002
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
185
ISSN
0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2278543940
Cited by
239
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
coyote, range expansion, top-down effects, top carnivores, urbanization, suburbanization, predator-prey interactions, northeastern North America, New York City, urban coyotes, predator reintroduction, human-wildlife conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Top Carnivores in the Suburbs? Ecological and Conservation Issues Raised by Colonization of North eastern North America by Coyotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052%5B0185:tcitse%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
GOMPPER, M. E. (2002). Top Carnivores in the Suburbs? Ecological and Conservation Issues Raised by Colonization of North eastern North America by Coyotes. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052%5B0185%3Atcitse%5D2.0.co%3B2